Tuesday 16 April 2013

Mat-times, group times, a waste of time?

In the recent newsletter of the Australian National Quality Standard Professional Learning Programme, Heather Barnes asked teachers of young children to reflect about whether group times are interesting and meaningful for children. Although group times are supposed to be the time for learning literacy, numeracy, music and movements, Heather quoted a child commenting that it was just a waste of time!

In New Zealand, we call that special time of the day as mat-time. To me, I believe in the value of having mat-times. From my teaching experience, I have not heard any teachers voicing doubts about mat-time.  Probably, due to the sociocultural framework of our Early Childhood Curriculum, Te Whaariki, we all share an understanding of the social nature of mat-times as an effective context for learning.

Of course, there are many other opportunities to promote literacy and numeracy; to learn about music and movements. However, mat-time is the only time for everyone to come together, teachers and children. And often, parents who come early to pick up also feel comfortable to join in. During the day, children have the freedom to choose what they want to explore and learn. Some may spend most of their time outside, whereas others may stay inside around areas of their interest for the whole session.  Mat-time could be one of the few occasions children see each other during the day. In Quality Teaching Early Foundations: Best Evidence Synthesis, New Zealand ECE educator, Sarah-Eve Farquhar noted that interactions with diverse peers facilitate children's cognitive and social outcomes. During mat-time, children work with, talk and listen to others, not just their own friends who they have been hanging out during their free play time. As children learn in a social context, mat-time provides opportunities for peer interaction and collaboration, which supports learning and maximises outcomes.

In addition, mat-time enhances a sense of belonging and acknowledges contribution. It is a shared experience co-constructed by everyone. In my kindy, the Muslim parents don't want her girl participate actively in any music activities. But they have no intention to take her out of the mat-time. They want her to be part of the big kindy group. I reassured her that she could just sit and watch when we were singing and dancing. She participated through watching, as part of a group, which is what she wants. It's about the sense of belonging. I don't think it is a waste of time for her to stay at mat-time.

Similarly, some boys did not want to participate in dancing, and they claimed that boys did not dance. While I pointed out that boys do dance, I let them step aside and watch. Will they be better off be excused from the mat-time? I am not sure. Some children participate actively while others passively.

Of course, as a teacher,  we need to take children's feedback about mat-time seriously. Why a child would say mat-time is a waste of time?  He was honest with his feelings but he did not communicate why he felt that way. There could be a lot of reasons. Teachers need to be better aware of children's physical and emotional well-being when organizing mat-time. Be flexible and willing to modify the mat-time activities. On a hot day, I usually advised the children to have a drink before coming to the mat. On an extremely busy day after a fire drill and firefighters' presentation, teachers need to take into account that children are too tired and unable to sit still and  would easily lost concentration. In that case, I would just have a short mat-time and incorporate more interactive components into my plan and involve children actively. I remembered a child used to say he wanted to go home rather than staying on the mat, when he spotted his mum coming through the door. I let him go ask his mum whether she wanted to join us on the mat. The child and his mum were happy to sit down with the group and we enjoyed the mat-time together.

It's about what lens we use to see the mat-time. In New Zealand, teachers tend to use a sociocultural lens, and we see the significance of social learning in a group. Alternatively, one may see the desire of individual children comes first. One may insist that children should have a choice, as mat-time activities are usually not initiated by children. However, teachers could possibly shift the balance of power to children by taking into account their interests when planning for mat-times.

As mat-time is an effective event to promote learning, I believe it is important that teachers focus on children's interests, rather than what the teacher wants to teach during mat-time. As the Australian early childhood educators say, play is learning. teachers should work harder to engage children, making mat-time fun, meaningful and relevant to children.  I will talk about some mat-time activities I have done before in another blog Children songs, rhymes and games. You are invited  to share ideas and contribute to this discussion about mat-time too.


Friday 12 April 2013

Play is Learning

I've just relocated from Auckland, New Zealand to Melbourne, Australia. To familiarise my self with the Australian early childhood curriculum, I researched on line and, interestingly, found that "play is learning" is clearly stipulated in the Australian National Quality Standard. All early childhood teachers believe in the value of play, but it seems parents are still not totally convinced.  For a long time, it has also been a common concern among many early childhood teachers in New Zealand.

In New Zealand, it is quite common for teachers to communicate through wall display the value of various types of pay. For instance, to dispel parents' worry that their child is just running or climbing up and down all day, my head teacher devoted the whole wall space listing out in bullet points what learning is happening in outdoors play. She also reinforced the value of play with photographs and child's voices to capture the thoughts and ideas in the child's perspective.

In addition, learning stories are often used to communicate to parents. We, teachers deliberately describe a play scenario as an "learning activity or learning experience".   Yes, we have to state the obvious, as parents are usually performance/ results oriented and may not be aware of the learning process. In the eyes of a trained teacher, a child who playfully mixed the paint from various paint pots were exploring the hues and transformation of colours, whereas parents sometimes just saw a mess. While I was impressed by the persistence of a child in hammering over ten nails into a piece of wood, the parents simply thought her child was just playing and did not make anything meaningful or useful.

I think, personally, it requires professional knowledge and confidence of the teacher to explain what learning is happening in play. When I was a beginner teacher, I was shy to talk with parents about the play and learn concept. Having worked in the field for nearly ten years, I am now more confident and fluent in describing the learning happening in a child's play. At pick up time, I always initiatie conversation with parents about what their child did during the day, and what I found interesting and meaningful in terms of learning and development. So, a parent eventually appreciated the learning happening during a simple drawing of a superhero, when I pointed out that her child paid attention to details when drawing flames for the motorbike of his superhero, which also showed great concentration the
child had.

It's a challenge for teachers to step forward to advocate for the importance of play in children's learning and development.